logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.05.17 2018가단126341
임차보증금
Text

1. The Defendants shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 18,880,130 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from April 3, 2018 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Chief;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) Nonparty E (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) is the transferee of the right to return the lease deposit.

On December 31, 2015, the Defendants entered into a lease agreement with the Plaintiff, setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 30,000,000 with respect to the whole three floors among the F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based buildings. However, the non-party company is the right to refund the lease deposit amount of KRW 30,000,000 on March 24, 2017 (hereinafter “the right to refund the lease deposit”).

(2) On April 19, 2017, the Plaintiff confirmed that the amount of unpaid rent and other expenses in relation to the claim for the return of the lease deposit of this case was 18,880,130, and the Defendants did not pay the said money. However, the Plaintiff sought a judgment as stated in the purport of the claim, since the Defendants did not pay the said money.

B. 1) The independent party intervenor's assertion against the Defendants. A) Nonparty G, the president of H Group, including the non-party company that committed a violation of the Act on the Regulation of Unauthorized Receipt of Claims by Non-Party G, took overall charge of the asset management of H Group (including foreign companies, E, I, J, K, L, M, etc.).

The above G made the appearance as if it was a business group with a large-scale asset and received money under the pretext of asset management, investment funds, and various business operations using it in collusion with non-party N, the next South-North Korea, and received 60,060,755,000 won from investors as if the investor had the ability to pay the principal at the time when the investor wants or at the expiration of the contract period.

However, the above G was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 12 years in Seoul East Eastern District Court Decision 2017 High Court Decision 201Da544, supra.

In addition, an independent party intervenor, etc. also from January 24, 2016 to the same year.

7. up to 18.18 above G 770,000.

arrow