1. On June 14, 2019, the Defendant’s revocation of the disposition of additional injury and disease approval against the Plaintiff.

2. The plaintiff's remainder.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff (BB) received medical care approval from the mining center’s employee with the mining center to August 31, 2018, with respect to “patitis in the direction of the left, damage to the right shoulder, satisfyingitis in both sides, satchitis in the upper right control, satchitis in the upper right control, satchitis in the upper right control, and satisfy in the outer side.”

B. On May 17, 2019, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “nekne-free pere-free persule persule persule persule persule persule persule persule persule persule persule per se”

C. On June 14, 2019, the Defendant issued to the Plaintiff an additional medical care non-approval (hereinafter “instant additional medical care non-approval disposition”) and an additional medical care non-approval (hereinafter “additional medical care non-approval disposition”) in accordance with the Defendant’s advisory opinion that “The Defendant considered the age of the Plaintiff at the right chain in the examination of video data, shows that there was a significant difference between K-L G2’s alley infection and the left-hand stroke, and that there was an external wound on the left-hand side.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition of non-approval of the instant additional soldiers is legitimate

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that: (a) more than 20 years of coal and kneeeee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne

Therefore, even if there is a proximate causal relation between the Plaintiff’s business branch of the instant case and the Plaintiff’s business, the instant additional injury and disease approval disposition is unlawful on a different premise.

B. The facts of recognition are as follows: (a) the Plaintiff’s mining center’s work experience and occupation period for the Plaintiff; and (b) the Korea Coal Corporation CYDD 1, March 1, 2015 to September 1, 2016; and (c) The Boan and Boan E, 2013.