A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 22, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement with the knowledge that the victim D’s children, an employee of the above multilateral loan fee, received KRW 100 million from the insurance agreement due to a traffic accident, and the victim made a false statement to the effect that “the perpetrator is in need of a traffic accident, and the victim promptly borrowed KRW 4 million from the repayment.”

However, there was no traffic accident by the defendant around that time, and even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to pay the money.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 4 million won from the victim to the E bank account (number: F) in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim, and received property from the victim by being transferred totaling 9.5 million won from June 22, 2012 to August 17, 2012, as shown in the annexed crime list, on three occasions, as shown in the annexed crime list.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the police suspect examination protocol against the accused (including cross-examination part against D);

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. In filing of a complaint, notarial deed, entry and departure transaction details, certificates, closed certification-Gcambs, investigation reports (related to entry and departure from the account in the name of a suspect), details of transactions between a suspect and an complainants, details of transactions between a suspect and Cdabs business owners among the E bank accounts of a suspect, details of transactions between a suspect and Cdabs business owners among the E bank accounts, details of transactions between a suspect's E bank accounts, details of transactions between a suspect and Cdabs business owners among the suspect's E bank accounts, details of use of a suspect's cash withdrawal period among the details of the suspect's E bank accounts, Internet guidance and search, Internet guidance and search, points of E bank delivery, Internet guidance and search, Internet guidance and search, distance between U.S. and U.S. bus terminals (related to the Cda addresses), investigation reports (related to the Cda addresses), Internet guidance and

1. The Defendant asserts that the victim’s children are insured.