The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Even if examining the reasoning in light of the evidence, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the mistake of facts in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment”), contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.