Defendant

In addition, all appeals filed by the respondent for the attachment order, the requester for the protective order, and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment imposed by the court below on the defendant and the person who requested the attachment order, the person who requested the attachment order, and the person who requested the attachment order (hereinafter “the defendant”), and the person who requested the attachment order (hereinafter “the defendant”), is too unreasonable.

B. Prosecutor 1) The above sentence, which the court below decided against the defendant, is too unhutiled and unfair.

2) It is unreasonable for the lower court to dismiss the Defendant’s request for the attachment order of this case even if there is a risk of recommitting murdering by the Defendant.

2. The Defendant’s crime of this case regarding the Defendant’s case is determined as to whether there was a mental illness from the wife of the Defendant.

“The crime of this case is a situation unfavorable to the Defendant, for the following reasons: (a) murdered as soon as possible at a large number of times on the ground that the horses were written off; (b) the nature and method of the crime was extremely poor; (c) the life of a person cannot be altered; and thus, (d) the crime of this case requires strict punishment; (b) the bereaved family members of the victim lost a minor family member and suffered a deep wound that is difficult to recover through life; and (c) the victim’s bereaved family members were committed by the crime of this case.

Meanwhile, the circumstances are favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, that the defendant committed the crime of this case in a state of mental and physical weakness due to this reason while suffering from symptoms of mental disorder, etc., the defendant and the victim's children want to repeat their wife against the defendant in the original judgment and the trial, and that the defendant was the first offender who had no record of criminal punishment.

위와 같은 사정들과 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성 행, 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 변론에 나타난 모든 양형조건 및 대법원 양형 위원회 제정 양형기준의 권고 형량 범위 ◈ 법률상 처단형의 범위: 징역 2년 6월 ~ 15년...