logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2016.04.20 2015고단434
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who drives a 650cc click flocks without registration.

On April 27, 2015, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.087% from blood level around 04:00, the Defendant driven the above Oral Sea, and proceeded in the direction of Masansan at the Masan Seaside, depending on one lane from among four-lane roads in front of terminal passenger ships on the Masan Coastal Sea located in 150, Changwon-si, Masan-si Coastal Sea.

At the time, at night and the defendant's front part of the front part of the front part, the victim B was on board, and there was a fireproof body for the central separation, so the driver of the Oral parta has a duty of care to operate safely along the lane by accurately manipulating the steering and brakes.

In this regard, the Defendant neglected this and neglected it, and caused the victim who was on the back stone to go over the floor by taking the parts adjacent to the Defendant's Otobane, and caused the victim who was on the back stone to fall off on the floor.

Defendant 1 suffered injury to the victim, such as flaverization in the right upper flaver in need of approximately 14 weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

2. On April 27, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.087% from the day front of the opening station located in the Masan-si Masan-si Masan-si, Changwon-si to the day front of the terminal in front of the above Msan-do passenger ship, while driving the above 0.087% alcohol leveling from blood alcohol level.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages, who owned the above Oral Ba, operated the above Oral Ba which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph 2.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of a defendant prepared by the police;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. A report on the detection of a primary driver;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. A written diagnosis on B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes regarding mandatory insurance;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow