logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.23 2016나19236
기타(금전)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3.Paragraph 1 of the text of the judgment of the court of first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal of the pertinent part as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

(A) At the time of the instant transaction agreement, 128 stocks of 4 pages 5 at the time of the instant transaction agreement at the time of the instant agreement, 3 pages 11 following the close-down of the pertinent part. The Defendant had no choice but to bring about 6 pages 17, 178, 620 won, 17, 148, 620 won, 620 won, 620 won, 620 won, which were 6 pages 17, 17, 178, 620 won, 148, 620 won, 128, 620 won, 620 won, 128, 620 won, 620 won, 620

2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is obvious that "17,178,620 won" in the disposition of the court of first instance is an erroneous entry, and thus, it is decided to correct it ex officio. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow