1. The Defendants: (a) each of them and the Plaintiff B, as well as KRW 3,520,186, and KRW 1,410,647, respectively, and the Defendant against them.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relevant Plaintiffs are the owners of E, E, 1808 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) at the time of macroscop, and Defendant macroscop is the implementer of the F&D project in the vicinity of the instant land, and Defendant U.S. Comprehensive Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is the contractor who received the said improvement project from Defendant macroscop.

B. 1) The instant land was owned by G, who is the decedent of the Plaintiffs. The Defendant macro-si obtained authorization for the installation of the sewage terminal treatment facility from the Minister of Environment on July 29, 1997, and obtained the instant land from the above G on December 2, 1997, and completed the registration of ownership transfer for reasons of this on February 11, 1998. However, as the instant land was difficult to carry out construction due to a civil petition filed by neighboring residents requiring the change of location of the sewage terminal treatment facility, the Defendant macro-si obtained the change of location of the sewage terminal treatment facility from the Minister of Environment on February 2, 200 and completed the construction of the sewage terminal treatment facility on December 2, 203.

3) Accordingly, the deceased G, who was the owner of the business site, filed a lawsuit against the defendant Dao-si on the claim for ownership transfer registration on the ground of redemption under the Changwon District Court Tong Branch Branch 2004Gahap618, and decided January 19, 2006 that "G deposited the amount equivalent to the compensation received from the defendant Dao-si with respect to the land in this case and expressed its intention to repurchase, and thus, the defendant Doo-si has the obligation to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration on the ground of repurchase." The appeal and appeal against the above judgment were dismissed, but the above judgment became final and conclusive on December 28, 2006, the plaintiffs, the heir of the defendant Dao-si, were completed the ownership transfer registration on October 21, 2013 based on the above judgment. The shares of the plaintiffs B were 821/180, the plaintiffs A, C, D, and D.