Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On May 18, 2015, the Defendant appealed and filed a final appeal with the District Court sentenced one year and two months to imprisonment for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act. However, on September 15, 2015, the final dismissal of the final appeal and the said judgment became final and conclusive.

On November 16, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Gu Senior Park in Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu, Seoul on November 16, 201; (b) held the victim C with one set of Tkikis in its apartment parking lot, which is worth KRW 17 million at the market price owned by the victim.

Around April 2013, when the victim received the above T Ski from the victim and stored for the victim, he/she applied the above T Ski with D to sell the above T Ski in KRW 10 million and embezzled it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness C and D;

1. Copy of each protocol concerning the examination of suspect C by the police;

1. Copy of the written statement of the defendant;

1. A copy of investigation report (Investigation into A telephone conversations) and a copy of transfer statement;

1. Tyski photographs;

1. Previous convictions: Criminal history inquiry, sentence, and search results of the case [the victim has consistently stated the fact of damage, while the defendant has continuously changed from the relevant case to this court, it is difficult to believe that the defendant's statement has been made, and there is credibility in the statement with the victim and D.

The decision is judged.

In other words, the defendant lent money to the victim and obtained the above Tkiskis as collateral, which did not contact with the victim and disposed of to D who is the partner of the victim.

First of all, D paid the sales proceeds to the Defendant upon request of the Defendant for sale.

The statement is inconsistent with the statement of the defendant, and the defendant actually lent money to the victim and received the aforementioned Tkiski as collateral, and made detailed statements about the details of lending money to the victim. The purpose of this court was to secure the claim for the refund of the purchase price to the victim.

statement, etc.