Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a licensed real estate agent operating "E-real estate in Busan-gu, and Defendant B is a person who operates the above E-real estate with Defendant A and the same business.

No broker, etc. shall cause an error of judgement by the client by means of false words and behavior, etc., concerning important matters relating to transaction of the relevant object of brokerage.

Nevertheless, around March 27, 2010, the Defendants conspired to act as a broker for a lease contract to rent the Seo-gu Busan Hamoel owned by the victim F in the above E-real property office, and notified the lessor G of the fact that it was impossible to establish a right to lease on a deposit basis for the above Hamoel, but did not have any problem with the establishment of a right to lease on a deposit basis, thereby allowing the victim to enter into a lease contract with the victim as if he had been aware of it in advance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants by the prosecution

1. Statement made by the prosecution with respect to F;

1. Protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of each of the Defendants

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a real estate lease contract, a copy of mediation protocol, and a copy of examination protocol;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Business Affairs of Licensed Real Estate Agents and Report of Real Estate Transactions Act, Article 49 (1) 10 and Article 33 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Act, Article 30 (Article 30) of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: If G, the owner of the telecom as indicated in the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, intended not to establish a right to lease on a deposit basis to continue to maintain the security value of the telecomtory building in the course of obtaining a loan as security for the above telecomtory, the above telecomto.