The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

공소사실의 요지 피고인과 피해자는 연인 관계였다가 헤어진 사이로, 2017. 6. 28. 경 알 수 없는 장소에서 B에게 전화를 하여 피해자에 대하여 “ 걔 임신해 갖고, 그년”, “ 씹할 년 낙태 비도 안 주고”, “C 지금 성병 있으니까 그 D(B 의 여자친구) 씨한테 같은 숟가락 그런 거 쓰지 말라고

Madern, Madro, Madern

c) has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts, such as “A pregnant person, even though she is pregnant, she knows that she would receive male introduction.”

In light of the facts charged under Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act, the "Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act" as stated in the indictment is judged to be a clerical error. The crime corresponding to the crime is not prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim under Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act.

According to the public trial records, the victim may recognize the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on May 28, 2018, which is after the institution of public prosecution. Thus, the public prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.