All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the sentence (a fine of two million won is imposed on the Defendants, and a fine of one million won is imposed on the Defendants A) declared by the lower court to the Defendants is too uneasible.

2. The crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties of this case was committed against the police officers dispatched by female defendants, and thus, it is necessary to strictly punish such crimes in order to eliminate the booming of legitimate public authority and establish a legal order.

However, taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendants led to the confession of each of the instant offenses; (b) Defendant A was punished once by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act prior to 23 years; (c) Defendant B was the first offender; (d) the Defendants appear to have committed each of the instant offenses by drinking 17 years or more; (e) Defendant A paid damages to the victims of the crime of destruction at an investigative agency; and (e) Defendant A paid damages to the victims of the crime of destruction at an investigative agency; and (g) other various circumstances, including the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, environment, environment, family relationship, means and consequence; and (e) the conditions of sentencing specified in the instant records and arguments, including the circumstances after the commission of the crime, it is not unreasonable to deem that the sentence imposed by the

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals are without merit.