1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 5,305,904 for Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 41,311,66 for Plaintiff C; and (c) for each of them, from December 24, 2010 to June 2012.

1. Basic facts

A. In the case where the plaintiff A, B, and non-party D (hereinafter "the plaintiff et al.") resided, the Ethy Eths were incorporated into the G Project District for the Korea Development Project (hereinafter "the project district in question"). The said housing site development project (hereinafter "the housing site development project in this case") was approved and publicly notified as G public notification on December 31, 199, and the implementation plan was approved and publicly notified as H on October 23, 2002.

B. The Defendant, as part of the relocation measures against migrants including the Plaintiff, etc. who lost their base of living due to being admitted into the instant project zone as part of the relocation measures, decided to specially sell the site to be developed within the said project zone by implementing the instant housing site development project. Around that time, the Defendant announced the supply of the site of migrants.

C. Accordingly, as indicated in the following sales contract list, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with the Defendant for the purchase of housing sites in the column for the objects of sale indicated in the above table (hereinafter “the instant detached housing site”) (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

[ table] 1 Plaintiff A, the sale price (cost) of the object of sale on the date of concluding the contract for the purchase of the sale on September 23, 2003, Plaintiff A, the purchase price of which was 1,219,460,002 Plaintiff B, the 27 December 27, 2002, J. 106,784,5803 DD 3, 2228.52,505,410, 162,50 of the sale price (cost) of the object of sale on September 26, 2002, the sale price of which was the date of the contract for the purchase of the sale to the Plaintiff, etc.

D. Following the conclusion of the instant sales contract, with the Defendant’s consent, L succeeds to the rights and obligations of L from February 27, 2003, M from L on June 23, 2003, and Plaintiff C from M on January 3, 2006, in sequence from M on January 3, 2006.

E. The Plaintiff et al. and the Plaintiff C succeeded to the rights and obligations successively from D paid the money indicated in the “total amount of payment” on the sales price table below as sales price and overdue interest.

[Report] The sales contract No. 500,000.