Defendant

All appeals filed by A and B and prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Determination as to the allegation of unfair sentencing against the above Defendants A, B, and prosecutor

A. As to the punishment sentenced by the court below (Defendant A: two years of imprisonment, confiscation, and confiscation, one year and six months of imprisonment, and one year and six months of confiscation) against the above Defendants A, B, and prosecutor, Defendant A, and B asserted that it is improper because they are too unlimited, and the prosecutor is too unfasible and unfair.

B. Defendant A and B have no record of criminal punishment in Korea.

Defendant

A paid the agreed amount to the victim in the original judgment, and the victim does not want to be punished by the defendant A.

On the other hand, Defendant B deposited the agreed amount for the recovery of the victim's damage in the trial.

그러나 이 사건 컴퓨터 등 사용 사기 범행과 같이 불특정 다수의 피해자를 대상으로 조직적ㆍ계획적으로 이루어지는 이른바 보이스 피 싱 범행은 특히 경제적 ㆍ 사회적 약자들을 주요 범행 대상으로 삼아 그 궁박한 처지를 이용하여 이들을 더욱 어려운 상황에 이르도록 하는 등 죄질이 매우 나쁠 뿐만 아니라 그 범행 수법이 갈수록 지능화 하는 등 범행이 야기하는 사회적 폐해도 심각하다.

In addition, the above crimes are highly likely to be socially criticized by seriously impairing the trust of the state agencies and financial institutions of the members of society as well as the direct victims.

Moreover, since these crimes are structural characteristics that are difficult to arrest the entire organization members, it is necessary to eradicate them through strict punishment even if they are subordinate members who have participated only in the crime.

Defendant

A and B are those who play a role in monitoring the withdrawals as members of the telephone financial fraud organization, or in soliciting supervisors, and are not less than those who participate in the crime.

Considering these circumstances, it is inevitable to punish Defendant A and B with severe penalty corresponding to their responsibilities.