beta
Text
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is Defendant A and B are the couple of a de facto marital relationship, Defendant B, Victim H (the age of 33) is the strife relationship, Defendant A, C, D, and E are the ex post facto marital relationship, and I are the employees of an entertainment shop operated by Defendant E.
Defendant
At around April 4, 2016, A and B provided a loan to the victim of the Daejeon Sung-gu J and 323 at the time of the lease contract. However, on June 21, 2016, the injured person was at the time of the operation of the massage treatment center, etc., and later he was aware of the fact that the injured person was at the time of his request while carrying the lease contract without paying the said loan.
Accordingly, on June 23, 2016, Defendant A and B provided Defendant C, D, E, and I with K-type car at the Sungdong-gu S. M. M. M. M. M. M. M. M., and instigated Defendant C, D, E, and I by bringing the victim to Daejeon and ordering the victim to go to the Daejeon.
Since then, Defendant C, D, E, and I enter the place of the victim at the time when the victim entered the place of the above 305 when:30 on June 24, 2016 from around 05:30 to 06:38 of the same day, Defendant C, D, and I enticed the victim by making a false statement as if they were individually confined to the victim and the job-seeking relationship with the victim, and Defendant C, D, and E are waiting for with the victim at the above 307 terminal. At the time when the victim entered the place of the above 305 unit, Defendant C, D, and E, with the knowledge that the victim was distorted, and we must see why we can see, if good resolution is made, we must see.
The change of the name is the subject of the change, and in the case of the last money, it threatens that the victim gets off, but the victim gets off, and the defendant C and D gets out of the above telecom. The defendant E and I attempted to get out of the above telecom and get out of the above telecom. The defendant E and I tried to get out of the surrounding area of the K Kaz car prepared in advance, but the victim did not resist and get out of the vehicle.
As a result, Defendant A, D, and E attempted to induce the victim to be detained, and Defendant C, D, and E attempted to detain the victim accordingly.