logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.11.28 2010가합8224
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant G: (a) KRW 502,467,673;

B. Defendant A and each of Defendant G.

Of the money stated in the subsection, 362,661.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The remaining Defendants, except Defendant M, are members of the Korea Metal Workers’ Union affiliated with or dismissed from a collaborative company (N,O, P, Q, R, S, T, and U) in the Ulsan Factory (hereinafter “the instant sub-chapter”) and members of the Korea Metal Workers’ Union affiliated with the National Federation of the Democratic Trade Union (hereinafter “MM No”) Hyundai Non-regular Workers’ Association (hereinafter “the instant sub-chapter”).

Defendant M is a representative of the Plaintiff’s W factory (hereinafter “instant factory”) located in Ulsan-gu, North Korea, Seoul (hereinafter “instant factory”) as a member of the metal labor union affiliated with the Federation of the Korean Democratic Trade Union.

B. From October 6, 2010 to November 5, 2010, the instant branch demanded collective bargaining by demanding that all the employees working at the instant branch be converted to regular employees, and simultaneously to pay unpaid wages to the intra-company employees as of the date of entry, through the metal labor union, which is a superior organization, to the Plaintiff via four times. The instant branch demanded collective bargaining by requiring that all the employees working at the instant branch be converted to regular employees, and that the employees paid unpaid wages as of the date of entry.

However, the Plaintiff rejected the said request for negotiation on the grounds that the employees belonging to the instant sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub

C. Accordingly, on November 12, 2010, the instant branch decided to hold a general meeting of partners and to conduct industrial actions by casting pro and pro and pro and pro and pro and pro and cons of industrial actions.

Defendant A fine of Defendant C 2 million won, I 1.5 million won, J 1.5 million won, J 1.5 million won, J 1.5 million won, 2.5 million won, L 1.5 million won, G 1.5 million won, G 1.5 million won, G 1.5 million won, G 1.5 million won.

D. Defendant 3 or 13 was indicted by the Ulsan District Court 201 High Court Decision 14533 on the crime of interference with business, and the said court issued a summary order to the said Defendants on January 30, 2012.

Accordingly, the Defendants filed a request for formal trial with the Ulsan District Court 201, Ulsan District Court 201, and the above court rendered a judgment as stated below on October 24, 2012 due to the following criminal facts, etc.

3.2

arrow