logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.24 2016가단107606
양수금 등
Text

1. Defendant A shall deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet to Defendant B’s vice house.

2. The defendant corporation.

Reasons

1. The facts in the attached form of claim do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged by comprehensively considering the overall purport of the pleadings as stated in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8 (including the number of branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply). In addition, according to Gap evidence No. 7, Defendant A prepared a letter of performance to clarify the above leased object to the same fire marine insurance company or to the person designated by the same fire marine insurance company or the same fire marine insurance company, even if the defendant is unable to pay the principal and interest of the loan to the same fire marine insurance company on January 2016, 2016.

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts of recognition as to the claim against Defendant A, Defendant A has a duty to deliver the real estate (hereinafter “instant real estate”) indicated in the attached Table to Defendant Non-permanent Housing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) designated by the Plaintiff based on the above written statement.

B. According to the facts of the above recognition as to the claim against the Defendant Company, the Defendant Company is obliged to pay the Plaintiff the remainder of the deposit amount of KRW 147,00,000 under the instant lease agreement from the Defendant Company to the date of completion of delivery of the said real estate after deducting the rent, overdue rent, management fee, and all other claims arising from the said lease agreement between the Defendants.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified, and all of them are accepted. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow