logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.08.23 2014가단266068
용역비
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 24,028,200 as well as 5% per annum from July 17, 2014 to August 23, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant entered into a service contract between the Defendant and the same subparagraph (1) on April 28, 2010, and the same as the non-party corporation (hereinafter “Dongho”) (hereinafter “Dongho”).

B) In relation to the housing site development project of a zone A, the Defendant entered into a service contract with the terms of being awarded a contract (hereinafter “instant service contract”) by setting the contract price of the same amount as KRW 342,450,000 and the contract period from April 28, 2010 to December 31, 2010 (hereinafter “instant service contract”).

(2) The details of the instant service contract are indicated in the terms of “general terms and conditions of the service contract” and “special terms and conditions of the service contract” and the main contents are as follows.

- General terms of the instant service contract - Article 3 (Contract Documents) 1. Contract documents are composed of contracts, general terms and conditions of the service contract, special terms and conditions of the service contract, business terms and specifications and calculation sheets, and shall have the effect of mutual supplementation as contract documents.

Article 17 (Inspection) (1) When services under the same subparagraph are completed, a notice thereof shall be given to the defendant in writing and the necessary inspection shall be received.

(2) Upon receipt of the notification under paragraph (1), the defendant shall conduct an inspection to confirm such performance (it shall be conducted in the presence under the said subparagraph, if it is prescribed by the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes or special conditions and if it is deemed necessary, and if it is requested in advance in accordance with a written request) within 14 days from

(3) In an inspection under paragraph (2), if the defendant discovers that all or part of the contract performance content under the same subparagraph is violated or unreasonable, he/she shall take necessary corrective measures.

(4) In the case of paragraph (3), when the contract performance period is extended, the defendant shall levy the penalty for delay under Article 15.

(5) The same subparagraph shall apply where the inspection under paragraph (2) is required to be conducted.

The club refuses to be present or cooperate in the inspection.

arrow