logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.12.16 2020나304640
구상금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with C (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Defendant is the insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with D Obane (hereinafter “Defendant Obane”).

B. On March 11, 2019, at around 16:27, the Plaintiff’s automobile: (a) turned to the left-hand left-hand left-hand turn on the back side road of the FH club located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu; (b) on the left-hand left-hand turn to enter the underground parking lot; and (c) on the opposite part of the direction of the Plaintiff’s vehicle driving, the Defendant Oba entered the said side to the left-hand turn on the left-hand side of the Plaintiff’s front right-hand side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle left-hand left-hand on the front side of the front right-hand side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

The Plaintiff paid KRW 1,220,000 as insurance money with respect to the injury suffered by G, a passenger passenger of the Plaintiff due to the instant accident.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1-4, Eul evidence Nos. 1-7, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is an accident caused by the negligence between the Plaintiff’s Plaintiff and the Defendant Oral Ba, and the fault ratio of Defendant Oral Ba is at least 50%, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 1,220,000 insurance money to G due to the instant accident. The Defendant, who is the insurer of the Defendant Oral Ba, is liable to pay KRW 610,000 out of the above insurance money to the Plaintiff seeking direct compensation for damages by subrogation of H under the Commercial Act.

3. The following facts and circumstances, which can be acknowledged by integrating the above facts and evidence of the judgment, that is, the driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, entering the underground parking lot, and making a left turn to the left only without properly examining the Defendant Oraba, coming from this part.

arrow