logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.11.24 2015나33506
소유권이전등기절차이행 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) Section 5-19 of the judgment of the first instance court is as follows: (b) “Isia has the same effect as the final and conclusive judgment, such as a protocol of protocol of protocol of protocol of protocol of protocol of protocol of protocol of protocol of protocol (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da104960, 104977, Mar. 27, 2014); and (c) the Plaintiff has already filed the same claim as the Defendant in the previous lawsuit of this case, but the conciliation has been concluded between the parties, and thus, the conciliation has already been concluded. Therefore, the Plaintiff's assertion on the conjunctive claim is not allowed to be in conflict with the res judicata effect of the above protocol of protocol of protocol of protocol. Therefore, except that the Plaintiff's assertion on this part is without any doubt or reason, we accept the judgment of the first instance court as it is pursuant

2. As such, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow