Defendant

All appeals filed by A and prosecutor are dismissed.

In full view of the following facts: (a) the judgment of the court on the claim for cancellation of the registration of the establishment of a nearby mortgage filed by S against J, K, and L on the part of Defendant A’s attempted fraud (fact-finding, misunderstanding of legal principles, unreasonable sentencing) is an illegal judgment that misleads the facts; and (b) even if the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage under the name of JJ is null and void, W has prepared and submitted W’s claims upon the request of the above Defendant B; (c) Defendant A did not participate in the preparation and submission of a claim statement; and (d) Defendant A did not participate in the preparation and submission of a claim statement; and (e) the act of creation of a collateral security was a separate matter from the preparation and submission of a claim statement; and (e) Defendant A did not have an obligation to prevent Defendant A from preparing and submitting a false claim statement even if Defendant B was aware of the fact that Defendant B prepared and submitted a false claim statement

As to the above perjury, the court has testified as it is, and there was no fact that the defendants abetted or aided the perjury, and the court has made a statement to the same effect before the above testimony, and there was no reason for the defendants to instigate or assist the above perjury. In the above case, the defendant's defense counsel was an attorney-at-law who had an office in Suwon, and decided to assist or aid the defendant in doing so in advance at the event of Hongsung Support before 30 minutes of the beginning of the trial. The time, place, and contents of the defendant's solicitation of the above perjury. This is due to the fact that J has made a false statement, which is the fact that J has been the fact that S, in the lawsuit of demanding the cancellation of the registration of the establishment of a mortgage filed against J, K, and L, and the judgment of the court has become final and conclusive, but the judgment of the court has ruled against the plaintiff S's assertion.