The judgment below

Among the plaintiffs, the part against the defendant regarding the second preliminary claim is reversed, and this part of the case is reversed.

1. The defendant's grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

The court below rejected the defendant's assertion that, on the premise that the defendant is liable to implement the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer as to the portion of the land that was not transferred to the plaintiffs, the plaintiff is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for damages on the ground that the plaintiff's obligation to register ownership transfer as to the portion of the land that was not transferred to the court below's joint defendant F reconstruction Association (hereinafter referred to as "original joint defendant reconstruction association") was terminated as a recommendation for reconciliation and there was no ownership transfer transfer registration as to the remaining portion of the land that was filed against the defendant, and there was no remaining portion of the land in the future in the defendant's future.

B. According to the reasoning of the lower judgment and the record, the owner of the instant apartment around 2003 filed a lawsuit for partition of co-owned property on the instant building site against the Plaintiffs and the Defendant, etc. in order to promote the reconstruction project of the instant apartment. (2) In the lawsuit for partition of co-owned property as to the said partition of co-owned property, the owner of the instant apartment, including the Plaintiffs, etc., (3) in the lawsuit for partition of co-owned property as to the building site, and (4) in the lawsuit for partition of co-owned property as to the site area divided into the commercial building site, the owner of the commercial building claimed that the amount should be added to 286.12, which is the site area for the appurtenant welfare facilities corresponding to the common use area of the owner of the instant apartment in the commercial building at the time of parcelling-out, and (2) in this regard, the owner