1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, 2,595,805 won and its corresponding to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointed C, respectively.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 3, 2010, the Plaintiffs leased the warehouse D located in the wife population (hereinafter “instant warehouse”) to the Defendant as the lease deposit of KRW 10 million and KRW 1.2 million per month of rent (excluding value-added tax). On July 25, 2011, the Plaintiffs increased the rent between the Defendant and the Defendant at KRW 1.5 million (excluding value-added tax), and entered into a re-lease agreement (hereinafter “instant re-lease agreement”) that set the lease period as of June 3, 2013 (hereinafter “instant re-lease”).

B. Under each of the above lease agreements, the Defendant occupied and used the warehouse of this case from June 3, 2010 to July 3, 2013.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 6 evidence, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The plaintiffs' assertion that the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiffs a sum of KRW 21,834,110, including the rent that the defendant should pay to the plaintiffs according to the re-contract of this case as listed below, and KRW 11,834,110, which is an amount equivalent to 1/2 of KRW 11,834,110, which is a sum of KRW 10,000,000 for the warehouse of this case which the plaintiffs should return to the defendant, as listed below.

Items (cost) ① 13,470,00 for electricity charges 1,804,820 for electricity charges 1,804,820 for water supply and sewerage charges 209,290 4,200,00 for toilet repair charges 200,00 for 6,150,00 for replacement of the door door door door 21,834,110 for 21,834,110

B. Determination 1) The sum of the rent to be paid by the Defendant during the period of possession and use of the rent is KRW 5,440,00. The sum of the rent to be paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiffs is KRW 43,620,00,000. The fact that the Defendant actually paid to the Plaintiffs can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the respective entries in the evidence No. 8, No. 2, and No. 3 as well as the overall purport of pleadings. As such, the Defendant is obliged to pay the remainder of the rent of KRW 11,820,00 (= KRW 55,440,000 - KRW 43,620,00) and delay damages therefor to the Plaintiffs. 2) The purport of the entire pleadings and arguments is as follows.