1. All of the plaintiffs' primary claims are dismissed.

2. Each of the Defendant’s orders against the Plaintiffs on August 10, 2012.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a school juristic person that establishes and operates a D University, E University, etc. under its jurisdiction.

Plaintiff

A on March 1, 1995, he/she was appointed as a full-time lecturer at D University (at present, the name was changed to F University; hereinafter referred to as “F University”) and was promoted to a associate professor on October 1, 2003. On March 1, 1999, Plaintiff B agreed to receive wages in accordance with the annual salary system with the Defendant as a full-time lecturer at F University, and was promoted to an assistant professor on April 1, 2002.

B. The defendant's disciplinary action against the plaintiffs 1) The Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development (Ministry of Education) conducted an audit against the defendant from August 22, 2005 to September 2, 2005 with respect to the defendant, and found that the defendant's payment of wages to corporate employees or payment of new construction costs of a for-profit chain G hospital was made from the school expenses accounts with strict spending purposes. Accordingly, 50 professors, including the plaintiffs, including 50 professors, were established on December 8, 2005, and filed an accusation against the defendant's president, director, president, vice president, etc. according to the above audit results on January 10, 206. The defendant violated the defendant's disciplinary action against the plaintiffs, such as the defendant's violation of Article 2 of the Private School Act, the Minister of Education and Human Resources Development (the Minister of Education and Human Resources Development (the Minister of Education and Human Resources Development)'s refusal to dismiss the plaintiffs from office and the defendant's opinion on June 28, 2006.