Text
1. The distribution schedule prepared by the said court on September 10, 2015 in the case of Goyang-gu District Court Goyang Branch C real estate auction case.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The National Agricultural Cooperation Clause Federation (hereinafter “CF”) extended loans to D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “CF”) several times, and completed the registration of establishment of each of the maximum debt amount of KRW 211,00,000 with the maximum debt amount of KRW 1,584,00,000 on March 10, 2005, and the maximum debt amount of KRW 240,000 on November 1, 2005, and KRW 211,000,000 with the maximum debt amount of KRW 211,00,000 on September 9, 2008.
B. On September 1, 2014, Nonparty Company was declared bankrupt as Seoul Central District Court 2014Hahap143 (2012 Gohap188) and E was appointed as bankruptcy trustee.
C. When the non-party company delayed the principal and interest of the loan, the Plaintiff acquired the right to collateral security from the non-party company filed an application for voluntary auction of each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 through 11 (hereinafter referred to as “instant factory,” Nos. 12 and 13, and each real estate appears to be closely related to the instant case, and the auction procedure was conducted on October 10, 2014, on which the registration of the decision on voluntary auction was completed with respect to the instant factory.
(hereinafter “instant auction procedure”). D.
Defendant A, upon filing an application for a report on rights and a demand for distribution in the instant auction procedure, began to reside in, around 1985, by making a move-in report, etc. after examining the part of the instant factory into a residential place. On February 10, 2005, Defendant A asserted that the said part is a legitimate lessee under the Housing Lease Protection Act, which was leased from Nonparty A to KRW 15,00,000,000.
E. On March 5, 2008, Defendant B also leased the part of the instant factory from Nonparty Company’s non-party company’s residential purpose to KRW 15,000,000, and claimed that it was a legitimate lessee under the Housing Lease Protection Act, which completed the moving-in report on the same day, and filed an application for a report on the right and a demand for distribution in the instant auction procedure.
(f) the defendant.