The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of the legal principles: (a) the Defendant received money from G in accordance with the direction of “J” and remitted the remainder, other than fees, to the account known by “J”; (b) however, the Defendant did not attract to commit phishing fraud.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (four years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on misconception of facts and misapprehension of legal principles

A. A. A joint principal offender under Article 30 of the relevant legal doctrine commits a crime jointly by two or more persons. In order to constitute a joint principal offender, a joint principal offender is required to commit a crime through a functional control by a joint doctor, which is a subjective element, and a joint principal offender is required to commit a crime through a functional control by a joint doctor, which is an objective element. A joint principal offender’s intent to commit a specific crime with a joint principal intent is to jointly engage in another person’s act and to shift his/her intent to commit a specific crime by using another person’s act. Such joint principal offender’s intent to commit a crime is not sufficient to accept it without the awareness of other person’s criminal act. However, it is not necessary to attract a prior conspiracy to commit a crime plan, and there is a trade name that each accomplice bears the elements of a crime between

(See Supreme Court Decision 2007Do6706 Decided September 11, 2008. In addition, in relation to co-processing two or more of the co-offenders in a crime, the conspiracy does not require any legal penalty, but is a combination of two or more persons to jointly process the crime and realize the crime. Thus, if a combination of intent is made in order or implied manner, the conspiracy is established, and as long as such conspiracy was made, the other co-offenders’ act is not directly involved in the execution.