1. The Defendant: (a) each of the Plaintiffs KRW 9,137,800, as well as 5% per annum from August 19, 2015 to November 11, 2016; and (b) thereafter.

1. Basic facts

(a) Project name: C2) Project name: The project implementer of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport and the public notice 3 of the head of the original Regional Construction and Management Administration of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport: D on September 25, 2013;

(b) Land to be expropriated and land to be expropriated 1): Attached Form 1 (hereinafter referred to as “land to be expropriated in this case”);

2) The remaining land is as described in Appendix 2.

(hereinafter referred to as “the remaining land of this case” in addition to the remaining land and the remaining land claimed by the plaintiffs, and the aforementioned land is collectively referred to as “each land of this case”).

(1) The date the Central Land Expropriation Committee makes a ruling on expropriation: Land subject to expropriation on December 18, 2014: It shall be as specified in attached Table 1.

3) Expropriation compensation: 418,186,300 won: An appraisal corporation for a stock company and one appraisal corporation for a stock company;

(d) Date of adjudication by the Central Land Expropriation Committee on an objection (1) : The content of adjudication by the Central Land Expropriation Committee: 3 appraisal corporations that new appraisal corporations in the future, and dialogue between stock corporations: An appraisal corporation and a stock company;

E. The appraised value of the land to be expropriated as a result of the commission of appraisal by the appraiser E (hereinafter “court appraisal”): The appraised value of the remaining land is as shown in attached Form 3. 2. The appraised value of the remaining land is as shown in attached Form 4.

3) The appraised value of the remaining land at issue: Attached Table 5. F. Each of the lands in this case related to land ownership is as follows. Each of the entries (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) in Gap's Evidence Nos. 1, 5, 11, 12, and Eul's Evidence Nos. 1, 5, 5, and 8, respectively, is owned by the plaintiffs with 1/2 shares.

result of the appraisal commission to appraiser E of this Court, the purport of the entire pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' claim against the primary claim is based on the expropriation ruling and compensation for the land subject to expropriation is KRW 418,186,300, and compensation for the court's appraisal is KRW 424,239,80, and the difference between the legitimate compensation for the court's appraisal and the court's appraisal.