Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On March 2017, the Defendant purchased clothes in the Internet shopping mall operated by the Victim C (28 tax) and requested return of them. However, the Defendant was aware that he was accused of a complaint against the police station on the ground that he spreaded the writing to the Internet that slandered the victim, who did not harm refund due to defects.

1. On June 1, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s Internet shopping mall business by force, such as: (a) from around 18:36 to around 20:09 on June 19, 2017 to making phone calls on a cell phone of the victim on a total of 140 occasions; and (b) obstructing the victim’s Internet shopping mall business.

2. The Defendant, around June 19, 2017, went to the police on the ground that the victim refused to communicate at the Defendant’s residence.

In order to commit suicide, any person reported; or

Radar

Lives, Lives, Lives, Lives, Lives, Lives.

up to the last day, in the event that the country is inside the telephone, the hand shall be in violation.

The text message of “,” etc. and the Defendant’s personal injury inflicted on his hand, thereby threatening the victim by transmitting the images asked to the victim’s cell phone to the complainant’s mobile phone.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (Submission of evidential data by a complainant, attachment), a criminal investigation report (related to a cell phone user used by the accused), a criminal investigation report (investigation into telephone communications of a suspect), and a criminal investigation report (Hearing of statements by a complainant);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intimidation) and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;