Of each defendant's case of the first judgment, the guilty part (including the acquittal part) and the second judgment shall be respectively.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The part of the first instance judgment: (i) Defendant and the person against whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter “Defendant” or “the person against whom the attachment order was requested”); and (ii) Defendant F’s defense counsel on the allegation of unfair sentencing stated in the statement of grounds of appeal “the second instance judgment’s insufficient deliberation and mistake of facts as to the facts alleged in the first instance judgment; but (iii) Defendant F’s defense counsel on the first instance court date stated “the aforementioned assertion as to the facts alleged in the facts alleged in the facts alleged in the facts alleged in the first instance judgment, and there are some arguments on the circumstances that the degree of Defendant F’s participation is weak”; and (iv) asserted only unfair

The sentence imposed by the court below on Defendant B, C, D, E, and F (Defendant B: 4 years and 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum of 4 years and 3 years and 6 months of short term; 2 years and 6 months of long term of 3 years and 3 months of imprisonment; 4 years of imprisonment with prison labor for Defendant A; 3 years and 2 years of short term of 3 years and 6 months of long term of 3 years of imprisonment; 2 years and 2 years of long term of 2 years and 6 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

⑵ 검사 ㈎ 사실오인 내지 법리오해 주장(무죄 부분) 1) 피고인 B, C, D, E의 각 성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(장애인강제추행) 및 피고인 D의 각 성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(장애인강간) 부분 원심이 인용한 “성폭력범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 특례법의 장애인 관련 처벌규정은 장애인의 성적 자기결정권을 보호법익으로 하는 것이므로, 피해자가 지적장애등급을 받은 장애인이라고 하더라도 단순한 지적장애 외에 성적 자기결정권을 행사하지 못할 정도의 정신장애를 가지고 있다는 점이 증명되어야 하고, 피고인도 추행 당시 피해자에게 이러한 정도의 정신장애가 있음을 인식하여야 한다.”는 법리는 구 성폭력범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 특례법(2011. 11. 17. 법률 제11088호로 개정되기 전의 것, 이하 ‘구 성폭법’이라 한다

Article 6. "Physical or Mental Disability".