1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 45,671,047 with respect to the Plaintiff, and 5% per annum from June 29, 2012 to June 18, 2014.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company that has entered into an insurance contract with D running the restaurant C in Gangwon-do Incheon Group B (hereinafter “instant restaurant”); Defendant A is a company that entered into an insurance contract as carbon for Samsung Fire and Property Insurance (hereinafter “Defendant Company”); and Defendant B is “the instant insurance contract with Defendant Eastern Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) and “non-distribution profa 0904” (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

person who has entered into the agreement.

B. Under the instant insurance contract, the Defendant Company decided to compensate for the damages suffered by the Defendant A, who is liable for statutory damages for physical disability or property of others due to the following accidents:

(1) An accident resulting from the ownership, use, or management of a house entered in an insurance policy used by the insured for residential purposes.

C. When the pertinent restaurant was put up for a considerable period of time, D asked Defendant A, who lives in the neighboring wife, to see that the Plaintiff she she she she sing down two times a day to stop the deterioration of the land of the country. On April 8, 2010, Defendant A, at around 19:30, at around April 19, 2010, at the instant restaurant, he she was released from the instant restaurant to the restaurant (hereinafter “instant fire”). Defendant A was subject to the suspension of indictment on the responsibility for the instant fire on May 3, 2012.

On June 28, 2012, the Plaintiff paid D insurance money of KRW 45,671,047 to D with respect to the damage caused by the instant fire.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 through 6, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff filed a claim against D with regard to the damage caused by the fire of this case. The defendant A bears the liability for damages caused by the tort against the fire of this case, and the defendant company is due to the daily life of the defendant A.