1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) shall deliver to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) the real estate indicated in the separate sheet.

2...

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff leased real estate listed in the attached list owned by the Plaintiff to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant commercial building”), ① deposit of KRW 30 million on January 28, 201, and the period from January 28, 2011 to January 27, 2013. ② On January 28, 2013, the Plaintiff leased KRW 30 million on a deposit, KRW 1 million on a rent, and the period from January 28, 2013 to January 27, 2015; and ③ leased KRW 30 million on a deposit, KRW 1 million on a rent, from January 28, 2013 to January 27, 2015, and from January 22, 2015 to January 27, 2016.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). On January 29, 2016, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a certificate of the purport that the instant lease agreement was terminated, and filed a lawsuit seeking delivery against the Defendant, but the Plaintiff failed to notify the Defendant of the refusal of renewal between six months and one month before the termination of the instant lease agreement, and the claim was dismissed and finalized on the ground that the said contract was renewed until January 27, 2017.

(Cheongju District Court 2016Kadan1642). On October 25, 2016, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a certificate of content that the Plaintiff had no intent to renew the instant lease contract after January 27, 2017, which was renewed as above.

[Ground of recognition] In light of the fact that there is no dispute, the entries in Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 3, and the purport of the entire pleading, the above fact of recognition as to the claim for main claim, it shall be deemed that the lease contract between the plaintiff and the defendant was terminated on January 27, 2017 by the plaintiff's notification of refusal to renew between six months and one month before the termination of the lease contract of this case.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant commercial building to the Plaintiff.

As the Defendant sought as the counterclaim of this case, the premium under the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Commercial Building Lease Protection Act") shall be paid to the Plaintiff.