The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. According to the consistent statement made by the victim D and the statement made by the defendant in the investigative agency and the defendant's investigation agency, the court below found the defendant not guilty of the defendant, since the defendant was guilty of the fact by changing the direction of the vehicle to the victim's own side and sufficient fact by changing the direction of the vehicle to the victim.

2. Determination

A. At around 13:50 on May 31, 2014, the Defendant charged the instant charges, on the ground that the victim D (the age of 25) was driving the Oral Traba while driving the Habanon-si and driving the YF, and driving the Habanon-si and driving the Habanon-si, while driving the Habanon-si and driving the Haba-si and driving the Haba-si and driving the Haba-si in the direction of the Haba-si and driving the Haba-si in the direction of the Haba-

When the defendant continued to overtake the victim on the 5rd line in front of the Central Park, the victim passed the front line of the Central Park, and later the victim passed the front line of the Central Park, and then drive a threat, such as speeding, in front of the direction of the victim of the third line on the road. In order to cause damage to the defendant, the victim kid voluntarily in the direction of the victim to change the victim to the 4rd line on the right side of the defendant's taxi in the direction of the direction of the victim to the direction of the change to the 4rd line on the right side of the defendant's taxi, and kid over the victim's direction.

As a result, the defendant carried the above taxi, which is a dangerous object, and caused the victim to suffer approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time damaged the above Oral Ba in excess of KRW 425,00 in repairing cost.

B. On the judgment of the court below, the court below directly shocked the taxi of this case and Obama.

The victim's statement to the effect that the defendant intentionally shocked the ozone layer is difficult to believe, and all other evidences submitted by the prosecutor are considered together.