beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On January 23, 2014, the Plaintiff, as Seoul Eastern District Court 2014Kadan235, issued a provisional attachment order on the claim for the return of the lease deposit against the C ground buildings at Yangju-si, Seoul East District Court (2014Kadan235, Jan. 29, 2014, the original copy of the provisional attachment order was served on the Defendants on January 29, 2014.
B. Since then, on May 28, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a claim for the purchase price of goods with the Seoul Northern District Court 2014Kadan104152, and sentenced the said court to the Plaintiff on May 28, 2014, “Ez. P. P. P. P. P. P.D. paid the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 36,608,640 with the interest of KRW 20% per annum from May 9, 2014 to the date of full payment,” and the said judgment became final and conclusive as it is.
C. In addition, the Plaintiff requested the Seoul Eastern District Court 2014TTT9503 to issue a provisional seizure and collection order to transfer the provisional seizure to the provisional seizure, and on June 23, 2014, the above provisional seizure (36,358,640 won) was transferred from the above court to the provisional seizure, and on June 23, 2014, it was decided that the above provisional seizure (36,358,640 won) was to be transferred to the provisional seizure and the remaining claim amounting to KRW 932,023, except for this, seized the above lease deposit claims against the Defendants
(3) On June 25, 2014, the original copy of the decision on the seizure and collection order was served on each of the Defendants. [In the absence of any dispute over the grounds for recognition, each of the entries in subparagraphs A and 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments, respectively.]
2. The defendant asserts that since he did not enter into a lease contract with Fzzzzz, there is no claim for return of lease deposit against the defendants of Fzzzzzzzzzz, the claim for the seizure and collection of the claim in this case, which is the claim for collection of the collection order.
The lease contract on the C ground building in Yangju-si between the Defendants and the Fz. is concluded.