logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.12.07 2016나63505
임가공대금 등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. "2." in paragraph (1) of the judgment of the court of first instance.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "2,932,600 won" in the second and fifth acts of 17th acts in the court of first instance; "22,982,600 won" in the second and fifth acts in the court of first instance; and the defendant's assertion is insufficient to recognize the defendant's assertion as evidence that is additionally submitted in the court of first instance; and it is as stated in the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the rejection of the statement of Eul or Eul's evidence No. 9, which is insufficient to recognize the defendant's assertion as evidence

2. If so, the decision of the court of first instance is justified, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the "2,932,600 won" in the decision of the court of first instance is obvious that it is a clerical error of "2,982,60 won", and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow