A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Highest 170"

1. On April 13:18, 2019, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Intimidation) was arrested as a flagrant offender interfering with the performance of duties for a police officer dispatched after receiving a report on a disturbance under the influence of alcohol at a “D” restaurant operated by the victim C (V, 53 years old) located in Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju.

After that, on April 10, 2019, the Defendant was investigated at the criminal office of the Gwangju East Police Station and the office of the Gwangju East Police Station on April 16:00, and upon release, the Defendant immediately sought complaints about the matters reported to the police by the victim in the “D” restaurant operated by the victim and then threatened the victim with the purpose of retaliation by finding out the victim who reported interference with his duties, such as “as the victim reported to the police, as much as the amount of fine of three million won has been paid to the police, the amount of fine is three million won, so as to be paid within the width range, she is called as her, her drinking, and her retaliation.”

2. The Defendant interfered with the business of the victim by force, at the time and place under the preceding paragraph, and at the same time and place, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by causing two female customers who entered the restaurant to “skib kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn knb

Accordingly, the defendant threatened himself with the purpose of retaliation, and interfered with the normal restaurant business of the victim by force.

around 09:40 on April 10, 2019, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s business by force by avoiding disturbances for about three hours, such as walking the city expenses to many customers who were in the restaurant while drinking, and allowing them to leave the restaurant.

Summary of Evidence

"2019 Highest 170"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. E statements;

1. 112 Reporting Table "2019,174";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement 1.