The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence (15 million won in penalty, 40 hours in order to complete the course) sentenced by the lower court against the Defendant is too uneasible and unfair.

B. It is unreasonable for the lower court to exempt the Defendant from disclosure and notification orders, in the absence of special circumstances that may not disclose or notify the Defendant’s personal information.

2. Each of the crimes of this case with regard to the wrongful argument of sentencing is a situation unfavorable to the defendant, where each of the crimes of this case with regard to each of the following facts: (a) each of the crimes of this case was committed by putting the victim’s her butt her at the age of learning (the age of 11), or by using the victim’s chest as her clothes with his and her fingers; (b) the nature of the crime was bad; (c) the victim was frightd with considerable mental shock and sexual humiliation due to each of the crimes of this case; and (d) the victim at the age of growth may interfere with forming a sound sexual sense and identity of the victim at the age of growth

On the other hand, all of the crimes of this case are recognized by the defendant, and against his mistake, the defendant's agreement with the victim that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, and the defendant's primary crime that has no record of criminal punishment is favorable to the defendant.

위와 같은 사정들과 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성 행, 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 변론에 나타난 모든 양형조건 ◈ 법률상 처단형의 범위: 1,500만 원 ~ 3,750만 원 ◈ 양형기준 적용 여부: 벌금형을 선택하였으므로 양형기준이 적용되지 않음 , 제 1 심과 비교하여 양형의 조건에 변화가 없고 제 1 심의 양형이 재량의 합리적인 범위를 벗어나지 아니하는 경우에는 이를 존중함이 타당한 점( 대법원 2015. 7. 23. 선고 2015도 3260 전원 합의체 판결 참조) 등을 종합해 보면, 원심이 피고인에게 선고한 형이 너무 가벼워서 부당 하다고...