Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for six months.
However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who is engaged in a game providing business with the trade name "D" on the 1st floor in Sungnam-si, A, and the defendant E is a person who manages the game room with the husband of the defendant A.
No one shall provide game products for the distribution or use, the contents of which are different from those classified by the Game Rating Board, or display or store such products for such purposes.
From October 2012 to March 16:00 on March 27, 2013, Defendants conspired to offer 50 game products that are different from the classification of the rating by the Game Rating Board, such as setting up 50-points in the instant “D” to provide customers with more than 20,000 points continuously, and providing them with game products with more than 20,00 points continuously.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Seizure record and list;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the examination result;
1. Relevant legal provisions and the Defendants’ choice of punishment concerning criminal facts: The Defendants shall be subject to the punishment of imprisonment under Article 45 subparag. 4 and Article 32(1)2 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (including the size and operation period of the game room, and the Defendants’ experience of being subject to suspended sentence or of fine for the same criminal facts in around
1. Defendants subject to suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act);
1. Defendants of the community service order: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act
1. Defendant A: Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;