logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.03.23 2017고정482
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 22, 2017, around 00:20, the Defendant: (a) driven a string-in vehicle in the 210 new 210-gu underground parking lot with a drinking in the 109-dong 109-on, with a drinking, and shocked the front part of the D low string-in car and E ststring-in car that was parked on the right side.

Around 05:09 on the same day, a driver was driven under the influence of alcohol by the Defendant, such as snicking and smelling on the face at the above apartment management office, after checking that the Defendant had paid a traffic accident by CCTV images at the scene of the accident by a snick G, who was dispatched to the scene after having received a report on traffic accident 112.

Since there are reasonable grounds to determine a person, the defendant was required to put about about 20 minutes in a so-called drinking measuring instrument and to respond to the measurement of drinking.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's drinking test without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the second public trial records;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (CCTV investigation) and a photograph rejecting measurement;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act was the criminal record on December 11, 2015, for which a fine of three million won is imposed due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving of Drinking) and a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the criminal defendant was committed at the time of committing the crime, and the criminal defendant is repented, and again, he/she does not stop such crime.

The sentence shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the arguments in this case, such as the fact that the defendant's age, sex, environment, etc. is different.

arrow