Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

When the defendant filed a detention warrant on February 20, 2017 due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (LA) on or around February 20, the defendant was the client who found the defendant in the law firm where the victim B had worked as office staff and paid 6.6 million won and delegated the argument, etc. of the criminal case.

Although the Defendant appointed the said law firm as a defense counsel, the Defendant was indicted for detention and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for ten months at the Incheon District Court on April 13, 2017, and was released from prison on December 22, 2017, and the Defendant’s complaint was raised against the victim.

On February 9, 2018, around 12:36, the Defendant called the victim at the Incheon District Court located in Nam-ro 163-ro 17, Nam-gu, Incheon, Incheon, and expressed an attitude to inflict harm on the victim by stating that “I will find it at present. I will see that I will put it up. I will put it up, and if I will see it out, I will see it up, I will find it up at now. I will see it up. I will see this ring up. I will see it up. I will see that I will see it up to us. I will see that I will see that I will come up in us. I will see that we will see that I will come up in us. I will we will see that we will see it. I will see that we will do so.”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of the police protocol law to B and C

1. Relevant Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is a threat by phone to the victim who is an employee of the law firm that the defendant delegated his/her oral argument, etc., and the crime is not minor in light of the method and form of the crime.

Until now, agreement with the victim has not been made or has not been made available from the victim.

On the other hand, the defendant recognized the crime of this case at an investigative agency and was punished for the same crime.

In the above circumstances.