A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On January 14, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspension of execution of 8 months of imprisonment with labor for interference with business in order to obstruct business operations at the closing branch of the Jung-gu District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 22, 2016, and is currently under suspension of execution.

On January 1, 2017, the Defendant took a bath to the victim D, an employee, without any justifiable reason, while drunk at C convenience stores located in Mapo-gu B at around 18:30, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s convenience store business by force by leaving approximately 20 minutes of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the convenience store.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement of D or E;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation, and application of attached statutes;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts is as follows: (a) although the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence on the same content as this case’s convenience store, and was still under the suspended sentence, it is not good that the Defendant committed the instant criminal act even during the suspended sentence.

However, it is reasonable to consider that the defendant shows an attitude against the defendant.

More than one defendant's age, sex, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking account of the sentencing conditions shown in the trial process of this case.