logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.06.08 2017나11714
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this case is as follows: (a) additional evidence submitted at the court of first instance, which is insufficient to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s assertion, other than the rejection of each description of Gap evidence 7 through 9, which is not sufficient to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s assertion, and therefore, (b) it is identical to the part of the reasoning for the judgment of the court

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow