The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On June 23, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was guilty of the facts charged; (b) one person who is unaware of the Defendant’s future performance name and multiple actors, on the grounds that the victim D had a light from the press report in front of the store located in the wife B, Young-si on June 23, 2018; and (c) one or more persons were heard.

Doctrine Doctrine

Does fe typ ma marina mali mali marien

Duchchch bits

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by “......”

2. Grounds for dismissing the public prosecution;

(a) An offense subject to prosecution on complaint (Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act);

B. Revocation of complaint by the victim after the prosecution of this case

C. Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act)