logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.03.07 2017가단10163
가등기말소
Text

1. The Defendants shall pay to the Plaintiffs each share indicated in the column for final inheritance in the separate sheet among the area of 906 square meters in which L prior to L at the time of leisure.

Reasons

On July 10, 1981, the provisional registration of the right to claim ownership transfer (hereinafter “the provisional registration of this case”) was completed on July 1, 1981 with respect to the land of 906 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”). The Plaintiffs completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to each 1/4 of the instant real estate on December 19, 206, the deceased on December 5, 2000, and the deceased on December 5, 200, and the Defendants inherited the net M in each share stated in the column of final inheritance in the separate sheet list list list, or recognized by comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of pleading in the statement in subparagraph 1.

The right to complete the reservation for sale is a kind of right to form a contract and, if there is no such agreement, within the period of exercise, or within 10 years from the time of establishment of the reservation, and the right to complete the reservation shall expire upon the lapse of the exclusion period.

(See Supreme Court Decision 200Da26425 Decided January 10, 2008). The provisional registration of this case is based on trade reservation on July 1, 1981, and it is apparent that the ten-year exclusion period has elapsed. Thus, the Defendants are obliged to cancel the provisional registration of this case to the Plaintiffs.

(A) The provisional registration of this case, as alleged by Defendant K, is a provisional registration of security and the secured debt has not been repaid, even if ten years have elapsed since July 1, 1983, it seems that the secured debt has been extinguished by the expiration of ten years as it is apparent from the calendar of July 1, 1983). Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim is accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow