logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원강릉지원 2016.12.22 2016구합88
국가유공자요건비해당결정취소
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 9, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant on the ground that “The Plaintiff sustained the images left down on the left-hand side (hereinafter “the instant wound”) of the Defendant due to a fire that occurred in a dead-end accident that occurred in the National War from around 1950 to March 1951, 205, which belonged to the National Defense Team and was engaged in night duty while completing night duty while engaging in the activities of spreading and monitoring the remaining soldiers of the People’s Forces.”

B. On March 17, 2016, the Defendant rendered a disposition against the Plaintiff on the ground that “the circumstance during which the Plaintiff suffered the instant injury did not have any objective data on the grounds that it constitutes “the performance of duties or education and training directly related to national security or the protection of people’s lives and property” under Article 4(1)4 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State”), “the performance of duties or education and training directly related to national security or the protection of people’s lives and property” under Article 4(1)6 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State, or “the performance of duties or education and training not directly related to national security or the protection of people’s lives and property” under Article 2 subparag. 2 of the Act on the Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's evidence No. 1, and the purport of whole pleading

2. Whether the instant disposition is legitimate or not, namely, requirements for recognition of persons who rendered distinguished service to the State or persons eligible for veteran’s compensation, or that the degree of physical disability therefrom constitutes a grade or higher prescribed by statutes, is liable to prove the applicant for registration of persons who rendered distinguished

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2011Du26589, Aug. 22, 2013). The Plaintiff is under the national defense group during the Korean War on January 1, 1951.

arrow