1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is the same as the part of the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases. Thus, this is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 2 of the judgment of the first instance court, the term "tender report of this case" shall be read as "public notice of the public auction of the above import right and the letter of bid oil of this case".

B. On December 10, 2013, the first instance court held 3rd 14, “The Defendant is against 40 tons of the quantity, the recommendation of which was revoked as above on the same day, until December 10, 2013” and “the Defendant is against 100 tons of the Yellow Sea bean, the import performance date of which was the date of the instant contract, until December 10, 2013.”

(c) for the volume of 3rd 18th 18th 1st 3rd 1st 1st 18th 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 200

For the first instance court's decision 5 pages 11, "the content of the public sale of import rights to 100 tons of the Congo" shall be deleted.

(e) 6 pages 2 and 3 of the first instance trial, “for the quantity of which recommendations have been cancelled as above,” the term “for the quantity of 100 tons of the Yellow Sea bean in which the successful bid has been awarded.”

(f) 4 pages 6 of the first instance court judgment, “the quantity the recommendations of which have been revoked” shall be deemed to read “100 tons of the Congo.”

2. If so, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.