logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.18 2015고단1507
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and three months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 1507] The Defendant, along with his name-free boxes (one name C), read information on the credit card and enter it into another credit card, forged the credit card using another person’s credit card information collected as “ridnb B&C” that can duplicate the credit card, purchased precious metals with such forged credit card, and then expressed that the sales proceeds will be divided.

1. Violation of the Credit Specialized Financial Business Act;

A. A. On August 31, 2014, in collusion with the Defendant of the crime of forging a credit card and the Defendant’s name unclaimed boxes (one name C), the Defendant: (a) sent a new credit card (G) presented by the principal customer F to settle the amount of oil; (b) pretended to pay the amount of oil, and then collected and stored the said credit card information on the “LAWC” which had been in possession of the said credit card, and then forged the credit card with the name unclaimed winners (one name C) by entering the said credit card information in the official card prepared in advance at an unclaimed place; and (c) from August 31, 2014 to October 6, 2014, the Defendant forged the credit card on a total of 40 occasions as indicated in the aforementioned attached Table by the aforementioned method, including forging the credit card information by inputting the said credit card information from August 31, 2014 to October 6, 2014.

B. From October 24, 2014 to October 30, 2014, the Defendant and the Defendant of the crime of using forged credit cards (one name C) conspired to use the forged credit card in collusion, and used the forged credit card at least 43 times in total, as described in the [Attachment List] between the Defendant and the Defendant of the crime of using the forged credit card, by suggesting that the card in the name of F (G) in the name of F (H) was genuine credit card as stated in paragraph 1(a) to I as if he was a genuine credit card.

2. The Defendant.

arrow