logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.03.29 2017고단5873
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 01:50 on December 8, 2017, the Defendant driven a BS-type car under the influence of alcohol leveling approximately 0.135% in the section of approximately 1.2km from the front day of the Gwangju-gu Gyeongcheon-gu to the long distance between the two roads located on the same road, which is located in the same road, as the regular director of the Seo-gu, Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu.

2. Defendant 1 driven the said car under the influence of alcohol at the time of the foregoing day while driving the said car, as seen above, led to the two-lanes between the five-lanes from the surface of the ceiling distance to the surface of the flower distance.

At the time, other automobiles are stopped on the front side of the car, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to check the direction of the vehicle on the front side and to properly operate the operation system, as well as to check the direction of the vehicle on the front side.

However, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant: (a) due to the negligence of neglecting the operation of the brake system and not operating it properly at the two-lanes; (b) caused the designated driver C to the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle owned by the victim D(39 years old); (c) continued to pass the vehicle on the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle; and (d) continued to stop on the four-lane of the same road after the vehicle passed through the said private road for dealing with the accident; and (c) caused the vehicle from the next side by leaving the vehicle at the Defendant’s vehicle with the speed of moving speed in the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, without imposing a tax imposed on the first one.

As a result, the Defendant was injured by the Defendant’s vehicle in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking, and the Defendant was on the part of the victim who was on the top of the operation of the said vehicle for about two weeks.

arrow