1. Defendant B:

(a) KRW 52,55,110 and interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from April 23, 2016 to the date of complete payment.

1. Claim against the defendant B

A. The Plaintiff’s judgment as to the cause of the claim operates “D” which manufactures the group of clothing, such as the two places and two welfare, and supplied the group of clothing to “E” operated by Defendant B, and Defendant B, from October 2012, the total amount of the price for which the group of clothing was not paid by the Plaintiff from the Plaintiff until October 2012, did not conflict between the parties, and thus, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 79,55,110 for the original cost and the delay damages therefrom, barring any special circumstance.

B. The defendant's assertion and judgment 1) First of all, the defendant claimed that the plaintiff shall deduct the amount of KRW 40,00,000 from the plaintiff's claim amount of KRW 40,00,00,00,00 from the bill number F, and the bill number G, the face value of KRW 20,000,00 from the bill number G, and the bill number G, and the defendant requested discount and paid the plaintiff the discounted amount. Since the plaintiff did not pay the discounted amount to H, the defendant paid the discounted amount of KRW 40,00,00 in lieu of the defendant. Thus, the defendant's assertion that the plaintiff shall pay KRW 40,00,00 to the plaintiff. However, since the plaintiff's claim amount of KRW 1,3,9-1,2, and No. 9-1,00, Eul's bill number 10,10-1, and 200, the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's above discounted amount of KRW 1,000,00.

However, it is not sufficient to recognize that the Defendant lent KRW 20,00,000 to the Plaintiff solely with the descriptions of Nos. 1-2 and 9-3 of the evidence Nos. 1-2 and 9-3. Therefore, this part of the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. On October 13, 2012, the Defendant issued a bill number J, face value 26,00 to the Plaintiff.