The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the prosecutor's summary of the grounds for appeal, i.e., the place where the accident in this case occurred, in the direction of the village bus operated by the defendant, are about 50 meters away from the crosswalk, there are no centralized prices, and there are commercial buildings in the road, which can anticipate the appearance of pedestrians who walk without permission due to the decrease of the commercial buildings. At the time the accident in this case occurred, there were no particular obstacles to the 16:19 square meters, and the weather did not see the front door, and the vehicle stopped along the stop signal except the passage lane of the village bus driven by the defendant, and there was sufficient possibility that pedestrians who walk without permission will appear on the opposite lane, and the village bus operated by the defendant will not have any special difficulty in securing the driver's walk due to the lack of any special difficulty in securing the right side of the road in this case, and the court below determined that the victim was at the right side of the road in this case, and that the victim was at the right side of the road without permission of the defendant.

2. Determination

A. The burden of proof for the criminal facts prosecuted in a criminal trial is to be borne by the public prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on the evidence of probative value, which makes the judge sure that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt, so long as there is no such evidence, even if there is no such evidence, the defendant is suspected to be guilty.