logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.05.09 2012고정3504
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 01:15 on September 20, 2012, the Defendant claimed that the Defendant damaged the EM7 car of the Victim D (the age of 28) in the front of the Korean National Bank, and brought about multiple divers and chines in need of treatment for about 14 days to the victim, while the Defendant claimed that the victim damaged the EM7 car of the Victim D (the age of 28).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. A criminal investigation report (general);

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Around 01:15 on September 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) took alcohol in front of the National Bank of C, the Defendant destroyed the property that would have approximately KRW 796,933 of the repair cost by making the victim D’s ES7 car parked at the front of the National Bank of C, and making the victim D’s EM7 car parked with lubing lubs; and (b) making the lubscing part of the lubscing part of the lub.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there is no fact that the defendant had damaged the vehicles of D as stated in the above facts charged.

3. In light of the above facts charged, although there is a witness D’s legal statement, photograph, and written estimate for inspection and maintenance of a motor vehicle, the photograph and written estimate for inspection and maintenance of a motor vehicle are merely evidence proving that there are parts damaged to the motor vehicle. Thus, the evidence as to the defendant damaged the motor vehicle as stated in the above facts charged is accompanied by witness D’s statement.

However, the witness D stated in the first statement that "the defendant was faced with the defendant's elbows of the taxi engineer and the defendant's elbows in the vision of the D and damaged the vehicle," but the "the defendant was elbows behind the elbs of the 3 to 4 times," when the police investigation is conducted.

arrow